Can I add something?
Nominees are a major problem because they use their real identity to be able to put assets under their names. I like the solution that Mr. Ménard brought forward earlier. Maybe change the burden of the person to be able to come to court and justify how he acquired his assets. He suggested that, and it's quite interesting, as a matter of fact. The nominees are good people. They're fathers, or like I said, mothers. They're real people. They're not necessarily bad people. They don't have criminal records. But if they have to come and justify how they did acquire that property, maybe that would be a solution. I didn't bring that forward. Mr. Ménard brought it forward, but it's interesting.
Or maybe change the “we have the burden to prove beyond reasonable doubt”--