Yes, that the onus is on the person, so maybe by prépondérance de preuve, maybe to change that burden, not necessarily give the criminal the highest burden at all, because it's known. I've been doing proceeds since 1992, and it's getting worse and worse. They don't own anything any more. It's a rental company. There's nothing under their name, or just about, and if there's something under their name, it's mortgaged to the top.
On October 22nd, 2009. See this statement in context.