Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you to all witnesses for being here.
I was wondering about something this morning and I'd like to ask you the following question.
Some of you believe it is very important to seize the property of organized crime members. However, we passed legislation in 2005, I believe, which came into force in 2006. It reversed the burden of proof. Yet, this morning we learned it wasn't being used and the only reason for that was that Crown and defence attorneys agreed not to use it.
If it is so important to seize this property, why not make further use of this legislation?