Thank you very much.
Thank you very much, witnesses, for coming today. It's very enlightening.
I think I need to ask this question to Mr. Brabant. I'm just carrying it a little further on the tools you believe investigators need, especially when it comes to the sophistication of organized crime. In particular, I think you were talking about solicitor-client privilege—well, not necessarily solicitor; it could be a chartered accountant or some other professional. When it comes to that particular person—or it could be a corporation or anyone being used to launder the proceeds of crime—I think that's sort of the road we were going down.
I don't think anybody wants to diminish the professionals' ability to be able to protect their client, but I think what you're referring to is tools, especially legislative tools, that would permit the police to access evidence. Yet at the same time, I'm wondering if you're referring to a judicial decision as to whether or not a certain piece of evidence were to infringe on that kind of privilege. Is that what you're referring to? I guess I'm saying you need to expound on that for the purposes of this committee's being able to make a more wholesome and fulsome recommendation with regard to a tool that investigators could use, while at the same time not diminishing or reducing those kinds of privileges that we as a society rely on.