Well, if you dare say it outside. Mr. Levant is a lawyer.
What I would say in seriousness, however, is there is this clash of rights then, isn't there, between the ultimate unfettered freedom of speech on one end.... And that's not even the characterization that was put to us; there is no unfettered right. There are the laws of libel, slander, defamation. There are the Criminal Code provisions. And then there is this right that an individual has to be protected from demonization.
Where's the balance as it's struck now? With the improvements that you've suggested, would it be struck with accepting the report from Madam Lynch's commission?