I think the improvements would help the balance.
I would just like to comment that in our constitutional system, freedom of expression always takes place at the balancing level. Our courts have decided that everything that expresses meaning is in fact expression for purposes of paragraph 2(b). There's been a lot of discussion, because that means lap dancing is expression. It means that pornography is expression. In the United States they don't do that. They decide what is expression and what isn't expression, give absolute protection to what is expression, and give no protection to what isn't.
What we say is yes, you now have expressive freedom. But let's look at section 1. How far can you take that expressive freedom before it becomes harmful? That is the balance that we do. It's a balance that we have some of the finest minds in the Supreme Court of Canada to help supervise. I do believe the changes and the improvements would help to maintain proper balance.