Thank you, Mr. Chair. My question is for Ms. Rosenfeldt or Mr. Mandelcorn.
Earlier, I had thought that Ms. Rosenfeldt was talking about the suffering of victims who had to go back to court to explain.... She said that she would soon have to go back and relive something traumatic that happened several years ago.
Ms. Rosenfeldt, I want to tell you how I see this. In Quebec, on December 6, 1989, a man killed 14 young women. This tragedy is known as the Massacre at the Polytechnique. Over the past 20 years, each year on December 6, we remember what happened. There is a great deal of suffering. Fourteen young women were killed. Every year, the mothers and sisters of the victims come to mourn for their loved one. Imagine if Mr. Lépine had been sentenced to 25 years in prison. We see their suffering after 20 years: it still weighs them down.
Ms. Rosenfeldt, I would like to address another issue with you. In Quebec, a murder was committed at the National Assembly. Former colleagues of Mr. Ménard's were killed by a man called Denis Lortie. Three people were shot at the National Assembly. The murderer is not currently in prison. The families of the three people who were killed are still suffering today.
You say that we are trying to resolve the problem. Are you in favour, yes or no, of section 745.6? Is what we are doing sufficient or not?