No. I mean, I think some of them may be bad policy, but being bad policy isn't the same thing as constitutionally suspect. Parliament is responsible for policy. The charter provides minimum standards of constitutionality, so whether I agree or disagree with the policy doesn't make it constitutionally suspect.
If you gave me a specific example, I might—if I had a chance to think about it—give you an opinion, but I wouldn't agree with that.