I'm not saying they're not taken into account. I'm saying I'm adding factors to the bill, Monsieur Guimond. There are aggravating factors and I agree with them, and I agree that judges can and should take those into consideration. What we're saying in this bill is that we are adding a number of aggravating factors that I think are entirely appropriate—for instance, even concentrating on the effect on the victim. Let's face it: if you've stolen $2 million from somebody who is very rich, that wouldn't have the same impact as on a victim for whom that $2 million represented everything they owned or was their life savings.
Again, specifying the conditions we want to have taken into consideration, I think, is very important. That's what we're trying to do with this bill. We're actually building on what we have in the Criminal Code, going back to your first question about where we came up with the $1 million. Well in a sense, we're building on what's already in the Criminal Code.