A point of order.
My impression is that the rules of what we're about today have to do with inquiring as to the witness's capacity or ability and that questions should relate directly to the witness's ability.
I'm a little concerned if we start down the path of asking this witness to express views about particular cases, or even about particular laws or statutes that she might have had to apply in previous proceedings. I'm new around the table, so forgive me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that is not what's contemplated by the rules for this inquiry and that we should be focusing not on the witness's opinions about legal matters but rather on her ability and training to do the job.
That's my point of order.