Thank you. I think you've both been fair in your comments.
Let me say again, this examination is restricted to the competence and qualifications of the candidate for the position. She has a résumé. I don't believe a question of clarification as to whether she was part of a panel or a court or a quasi-judicial body that made a decision is necessarily off base.
In terms of now ranging into opinions as to what she may do in the future, or what she has done in the past in terms of those decisions, I'm not sure those are necessarily directed at the competence and qualifications of the candidate. But I do agree with Mr. Murphy, she's probably quite capable of defending herself and addressing that.
Please.