First, as I said earlier, the two-year minimum mandatory sentence probably will be, in some cases, a very strong deterrent for some individuals. Others, who are definitely committed to doing large-scale fraud, may commit to that fraud anyway, regardless of whatever minimums are out there. I'm a firm believer that in a number of cases it has a strong potential to be a useful deterrent. As I mentioned earlier, in terms of chasing the money outside of Canada, it depends on partnerships and the cooperation of foreign countries, as well. It's out of our jurisdiction. We have no jurisdiction in those countries.
We have a number of mechanisms to assist in our investigations. For example, the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act is a mechanism under which we do most of our bilateral-type investigative work with foreign countries. Again, it depends on the country. It depends on the type of case. No two investigations in a foreign jurisdiction are alike.
Again, without speaking of any specific investigations, I can say that I think we do a good job trying to locate money. It comes down to how we interact and engage that foreign jurisdiction to cooperate with us and work closely with us.