The question was that the false prospectus, fraudulent manipulation of stock markets, and a series of other very defined fraudulent acts are considered today, in the present Criminal Code, aggravating circumstances that the judge can take into account in determining the sentence of someone who is convicted.
Under the bill that the government has tabled, they remain aggravating circumstances, so the question is, if someone were convicted under subsection 380(2) or section 400, would they be liable to a mandatory minimum?