Professor Solomon is making the argument that if we go to 0.05--and it's been proven in a number of countries that have gone in this direction--fewer people will be driving while impaired. Your argument on the legal side is that we shouldn't go down that road because it's going to lead to fewer convictions. So I'm having a little bit of trouble marrying the two concepts and strategies. I wonder if you can just elaborate a bit more on yours.
On March 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.