It's a very good question. As I indicated in my opening remarks, I think there are some opportunities to look at the Seized Property Management Act to possibly provide some amendments.
One of the issues we are facing right now is that seized property management will not manage an asset until a management order has been obtained by the courts. There is a gap that can be anywhere from one week to six months where the police inherit the responsibility and the cost of managing the asset until turning it over to seized property management.
First of all, the police are not management. We're not experts at managing assets. Secondly, we don't have the resources to manage those assets. Thirdly, we don't have the ability to get funding from the forfeitures to help us in that cause, whereas SPMD does. It's an area where we would like to see some improvement.
We talked about federal prosecution matters and provincial prosecution matters. If we have a federal matter, we're again dealing with SPMD. If we have a provincial matter, we're dealing with the province. We're again dealing with two different entities. It becomes complicated and convoluted. If we had a one-time, one-stop shop, or whatever you want to call it, it would be a lot easier for us.