I understand your reticence to get into policy, or God forbid, politics. I understand. But you're a lawyer. You deal with this every day. You read decisions. I'm asking you to comment not on what it would look like but on what it could look like.
It's a very general, amorphous concept, this concept of relevance. What is and what isn't? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Relevance is in the eye of the framer. Can it be codified, or can it be made part of a policy or protocol?