I will answer the first part, concerning compliance. Let us take the case of a jeweller who should be providing us with a report because he, for example, executed a transaction worth more than $10,000 or that could be linked to a suspicious operation. In such a case, the report would be reviewed by my colleague responsible for analysis, and this could entail disclosure, but this work is done in Canada. Unless police services or our international colleagues make a request. With this condition, our memorandums of understanding will apply.
On April 15th, 2010. See this statement in context.