Welcome, Justice LeSage.
I know Mr. Woodworth and Mr. Murphy both raised this matter with our earlier witnesses. The idea is that we, as parliamentarians, could be looking at codifying the definition of relevance or trying to work more specifics into the code or into the Canada Evidence Act around Stinchcombe, and I think the direction would be to try to limit its scope somewhat.
I have two questions. First, do you think that's possible? Second, if it is possible, is it appropriate that as legislators we should look to do that?