Thank you for that.
With regard to the proposed amendment--I think it's to section 645--to allow any judge in the pre-trial stage to rule, could you give us some perspective from the defence side? Would they be objecting to that? Having done criminal trials, I'm thinking in terms of being maybe three-quarters of the way through the trial, and then there's a dispute over whether evidence is going to come in. The trial judge has an advantage at that point, because he or she has heard all the rest of the evidence, evidence that a pre-trial judge probably would not have heard.