It just seems to me that we need three meetings instead of two, because we have a lot of material to cover. There is a lot of interest, I think, from all of us.
I appreciate what Mr. Norlock was saying, but I do believe legal aid is an aspect we should look into, and not necessarily the funding of legal aid but how they articulate their participation in these mega-processes.
Is it possible to think of a third meeting eventually, before we break for the summer?