Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think having five witnesses over two days is sufficient. Perhaps later if there's more time we can go down that route. But if too many people are called upon to give evidence and chucked into one day, other than their statements, we don't get enough time for in-depth questioning.
The U.K. group sounds like they cover about five specific areas, all of which we have explored, so we should have them for sure. With CSIS and Homeland Security, we share the longest border in the world, so there's an intricate relationship there. We can hear from Legal Aid, but I think their message will be that they don't have enough money; they need more money. I could almost say what they're going to say. I think we know that. I'm not downplaying the seriousness or legitimacy of it, but I think we want to get into the meat of the matter--the mechanics of the matter.
So I think over those two days we should have the three groups I just mentioned--the U.K. group for sure. I would almost say that two hours will be insufficient to listen to them. Then there's CSIS and Homeland Security. I would like to hear from the U.K. group for the full two hours because of the five areas. I imagine the analyst would not have brought them to our attention unless he felt they were very worthy of our attention.