Okay. I think that's very instructive.
Tell us a bit about the factors that prosecutors look at when seeking an adult sentence. You used intentional infliction of harm as an evident one, but the current legislation gives you that flexibility. Tell me about other circumstances in which you would ask your prosecutors to seek an adult sentence, other than that one example. Are there others, and is there anything in this legislation that either makes that easier for you or that limits that discretion?
What I am trying to get at is that I think a lot of the push for this legislation is fuelled by an attempt to convince the public that the youth system fails and that repeat violent youth offenders are getting probation and going back to school the next day. My sense is that's not the case, because there are tools in the existing legislation that allow you to deal with that narrow band of repeat violent youth offenders--leaving aside the pretrial custody, with which I agree.