Thank you very much.
I'd like to address a question to Mr. Bergman, if I may, in relation to clause 2 and the definition of “violent offence” and the question of adding in the “substantial likelihood of causing bodily harm”.
I have looked, and the only place in which I can see that the characterization of a violent offence makes a difference is that in paragraph 39(1)(a) it gives a judge the discretion to impose a custodial sentence. Am I right that this is the only place in which the definition change of “violent offence” will matter?