I wonder how you feel about seeing an objection dealt with rather than dealing with it yourself, Milord.
The point I am making--and I admit, I'm making a submission, just as Mr. Woodworth made his--is that I find them remarkably different. We had another judge in camera who suggested that perhaps judges would interpret those competing provisions differently. The result would be--in my view, in my submission--different, in that a judge would put, as the words say, the “protection of the public” primordially, and that might lead to more incarceration. I think we all agree that when a person's locked up, they're not out on the street. That's axiomatic. It's not necessarily good for the long-term protection of society, etc., and it doesn't further rehabilitation sometimes.
I'd like to have your view on how those are different--if you think they are vastly different.