That is how wars have started: because people did not understand each other. So we will go slowly and try to understand each other.
I have a practical case for you, Mr. Hawkes or Mr. MacDonald. I truly want to understand. I read your brief very carefully. You emphasized clause 4 of the bill. As a result, I am providing you with a practical example. Suppose a youth commits a robbery, an armed robbery. That constitutes a serious offence. He is released with certain conditions. This youth continues to commit thefts. His friends go along with him, he commits petty thefts and takes joy rides, etc. Did you actually tell us that, in such a case, this youth could not be kept in custody?
I would like to discuss section 524, I believe. In fact, I am referring to the section of the Criminal Code that states that the release of a person can be reviewed. I am wondering. Under this section, a youth could continue to commit offences for as long as his trial has not yet been held, because he has been released. Moreover, he could not be incarcerated or have his release revoked while waiting for his trial even if he commits a series of thefts. Is that what I heard you say?