Could I suggest some information for your consideration? As you know, it's a principle of statutory interpretation that you have to give meaning based on the intention of the statute, and if you were to look at clause 3 and you inserted the word “e-mail”, there would be, in my view, no way that you would be, as somebody who sends an e-mail, subject to that provision. Because if a person is advised in the course of providing e-mail to the public—in your example, something that you would send out to some members of the public by e-mail—of an Internet protocol address or a URL where child pornography may be available to the public, could that happen in that ordinary e-mail that you're sending out? I would suggest that it couldn't.
You're sending an e-mail from your e-mail address with some information. You're not providing an e-mail service. If you were providing an e-mail service, it would be possible that as part of that e-mail service, there would be URLs or IP addresses that included child pornography.