Thank you.
As I look at the definition of Internet service, and I'm just using the words “electronic mail” that are in the definition section of the bill, Internet service includes other things, but one of them is electronic mail. So if you go down to clause 3, one of the charging sections, and exchange the words “electronic mail” for “Internet service” and I read it, it says, “If a person is advised in the course of providing electronic mail...”—e-mail—“...to the public of an IP address...”, etc.
As I read that, the charging section seems to implicate a person who, in the course of sending out an e-mail to the public, becomes aware of this information. They would then become subject to the provisions of this snitch law. And I use the term “snitch law” because that's what it is. As much as the objective of the bill is a noble one, this is a perfectly simple snitch law, like the kind they had in East Germany after the Second World War.
Anyway, could I ask you to please confirm to me that an individual in that circumstance, sending out an e-mail to the public, would be charged with the obligation in this clause, and if he or she did not report, he or she would be subject to a charge and conviction under this law?