Currently, in the four provinces that have enacted legislation--two are in force and two are not--that is all very similar. They're all based on the provincial jurisdiction on child welfare. So they're broad-based and require any person residing in the province to report to a designated agency or to police when they encounter child pornography.
They do not have an evidence-gathering or protection provision that the federal legislation has. On the flip side of that--and this is part of the point that I tried to address earlier--under the criminal law power, it's a broad power, but it's a narrow power at the same time. It has to serve a criminal law purpose, and one of the issues about approaching it as.... We looked at the possibility of applying this to society broadly, and there was no real nexus between the average citizen and child pornography. We could create that nexus between ISPs and child pornography, since the proliferation of child pornography has taken place over the Internet.
So it was easy to create a duty, and, after creating the duty, an offence for breaching that duty. So targeting ISPs under the criminal law power was appropriate, whereas targeting the public in general under the criminal law power was not.