Thank you.
I'm going to try to restrain myself in response to Mr. Lee, but in fact it doesn't talk about e-mail. It does talk about “in the course of providing an Internet service to the public”. So I would hope that if Mr. Lee is sending out mass e-mails and discovers that his e-mails include an Internet protocol address or uniform resource locator where child pornography may be available, he wouldn't mind reporting that.
However, I have other fish to fry here, and I'd like to direct the witnesses' attention to clause 10, which simply states that a person who has reported information in compliance with the “laws of a province or foreign jurisdiction is deemed to have complied with this Act”. And I have a concern that simply reporting information pursuant to the laws of a province or another jurisdiction may not be adequate if those laws do not contain a preservation section such as this act does, which requires the person who reports to preserve computer data.
I'm wondering if perhaps you might go back and give some thought to whether or not clause 10 is overbroad in that it may remove our ability to preserve the evidence simply because it is law of another jurisdiction that has been complied with. Could I ask you to just take that back to the shop and think about it for me, please?