Relevant in terms of the limited mandate that he has and the terms of reference. The terms of reference refer to the documents that may have been asked for in the motion.
There are documents that are relevant and would appear to continue to become relevant in view of what the committee might be hearing. As those areas become relevant, would those documents...? For instance, the JTF-2 documents--we now have reports that there are some allegations, particularly with respect to the U.S. forces, and our forces work with them... There may have been some extrajudicial killings, and that's why McChrystal has restructured the reporting. Would those documents relevant to that particular area be placed before Mr. Iacobucci?