It's an exercise. You may think it's futile, but I have seen court cases where, believe it or not, the raison d'être behind sections being passed has been used by lawyers, and this is a good discussion. I'm pretty assured that it won't go beyond the scope. It may in the future—I'm persuaded by Mr. Dechert or Mr. Norlock, I forget--hamstring this growing, emerging field.
So I will withdraw the amendment if there is consent for that.
(Amendment withdrawn)
(Clauses 13 and 14 agreed to)