I think all parties around the table here support the bill, the thrust of the bill and the objective of the bill. The glitch that we've uncovered is a discrepancy between the English and the French. It's tangible, it's material, and the question is whether we should fix it here, which would require the bill to go back to the Senate. That isn't a huge problem, as I'm sure it will go through there in about 10 minutes. But Monsieur Ménard's amendment can be put, and be adopted or not.
Someone described a friendly amendment to that. It doesn't have to be a friendly amendment, but can just be an amendment that comes forward in a way that would address the apparent discrepancy. I'd be prepared to support that. It's not rocket science, apparently. It's just to get some words en français that emulate “suicide bombing” rather than “suicide attack”.
If any members opposite had such a wording to propose as an amendment, I'd probably support it. I can't speak for anyone else here, but we should try that. If it's not going to work, then let's just swallow the pill and move on.