Thank you.
If I'm not mistaken, in most courts, before a person is sentenced, there's a pre-sentence report, and in that pre-sentence report there usually is availability of a review of the person's background, including their social status, including some of the issues they've dealt with in their life, and the courts must take that pre-sentence report into account when they sentence. So the court when it sentences them is already aware that they may have been economically disadvantaged, that they may have come from a broken family, that they may have had some substance abuse issues, that their husband may not have been the husband he should or could have been, and that they have been to some extent not able to enjoy some of the things in life that other people have, and the court takes that into consideration when it does the sentencing. Is that not correct?