Yes, and I did the last time, too, so thank you.
I have some questions.
I just want to confirm with Ms. Kane that the current wording of this amendment relying on subsection 380(1) would catch almost every case of someone who took money from people, for good or bad reasons, for pretence, but in the end defrauded them of the money. Because what I'm describing doesn't involve manipulating the stock market; it involves deceitfully taking money from individuals. That's fully covered by subsection 380(1), isn't it?