Yes.
And then, I would have said to Mr. Woodworth that I would have thought it would be really easy to value a stock market fraud, because almost everything on the stock market has a listed value or has a value somewhere. In any event, that's probably moot.
But I did note that the amendment proposed by my colleague, unlike proposed subsection 380(1.1) that is proposed as an amendment, does not require the existence of an indictment. This penalty could apply with this amendment on a simple summary conviction. If that is the case--and as I read it, that appears to be the case--and my colleague is aiming at stock market fraud, then a prosecution summarily, based on the wording that I see now in the amendment, could result in the mandatory minimum two-year sentence if it's a million dollars or more.
I'm just wondering if in the rest of the Criminal Code we have at least some instances where there are mandatory minimum sentences for summary convictions.