I'm not an expert on American bankruptcy law, but my understanding is that, as in Canadian bankruptcy law, a trustee in bankruptcy can go back and essentially set aside transactions for a period of three or five years.
What I'd ask you to consider is whether we could establish, as part of the restitution process, some way by which we could essentially reallocate those losses in a more equitable way, so that some people don't end up getting all their money back with an enormous rate of return and other people get nothing. I don't think that's fair and I don't think it helps our capital markets.