With respect to the distribution of the proceeds of the fraud that you do get and who gets them and how, you are correct that it's my view that the criminal procedure and process are ill-equipped to do it. The process Mr. Groia was talking about is quite often done in a receivership or through a trustee, which is separate from the criminal process. My concern, which I expressed in my opening statement, is that the victims are misunderstanding the bill, such that they think they're going to get their money back through the restitutionary process set out in the bill.
Mr. Groia is correct. You're not really changing the current restitutionary schedule in the Criminal Code. You're beefing it up a bit, but you're not making it run along the lines that were explained, whereby people will have different varying claims to profit, to their principal, and to who gets what ahead of whom in the priority of what is found. So if you find a certain amount of money, who gets to share in it is not dealt with through the criminal process currently, and I don't think it ought to be, because I don't think the criminal process can deal with it.