Right.
I just wanted to be sure that I understand your position. Here we have legislation that comes to grips with a real problem, that is big and getting bigger, in my opinion. However, instead of its intended goal, it achieves exactly the opposite of what it should be achieving. This is because it greatly complicates the work of prosecutors, it greatly adds to the work of judges and prosecutors, which is likely to result in them being able to deal with fewer cases and give no real hope to victims. So the victims who want to turn to the courts for restitution have only false hopes, whereas they should be able to find another way of getting reasonable restitution. Is that your view in a nutshell?