I do not have much time, and I have even less because of the delays with the interpretation. There's something that we should be compensated for from time to time.
That said, for fraud, as for all the offences in the Criminal Code, there are accessories of different kinds, some of whom play a very minor role. Take, for example, a secretary or a receptionist working in what seems to be a perfectly legal company, like Vincent Lacroix's. At some point, she begins to have doubts about the legality of what Mr. Lacroix is doing, but she stays with the company anyway and therefore becomes complicit because she understands that people are being defrauded.
So we could see people convicted for major frauds though they played a minor role. Clearly, the judge would take that into consideration and might not impose a prison sentence, although there would still be a penalty. Am I correct?