Thank you.
I'm just going to make a comment and ask one question, and then I propose that we give each one of our three witnesses three minutes to wrap up for themselves, maybe share something that you wanted to get out on the table but haven't been able to. Is that fair? All right.
Just one comment. My fear is that when we're talking about mandatory minimum sentences, we're spending all of our time talking about deterrents and not the prophylactic effect of mandatory minimum penalties.
I would commend to the two of you gentlemen the work that's being done by the criminology department at the University of the Fraser Valley. I don't know if you know John Martin. Certainly you would be familiar with Darryl Plecas. Their work seems to indicate that we do have a problem with the most prolific offenders.
Mr. Trudell, the comment you made was that courts are equipped to deal with repeat offenders. Their research seems to contradict that. So they are strong proponents of mandatory minimum sentences, but only in a very focused way against the most prolific and recidivist offenders that we have to deal with in our system.
Mr. Henry, I really enjoyed your testimony, because I think you're dealing with the challenges that most of us face in our communities. You're dealing with ground-level crime, which isn't necessarily part of organized crime, although our study has expanded to the point where it's encompassing those kinds of challenges as well.
You referred to single-parent families as survival units. Of those survival units, how many of them are headed by mothers?