He told the parole board that. I don't think that Mr. Dechert has ever gone before the parole board, because he would know that its main interest is to defend victims. That is its main concern.
Not another point of order, Mr. Dechert!
The debate is on the following question: how can we protect victims? They are not informed. The best way is to not inform them that Mr. Olson appeared before the board. That way, they won't be traumatized. No, they must be informed! That is where the problem lies, and I would like to hear your view on that, Ms. O'Sullivan.
How can we prepare victims for the fact that a murderer who has reoffended may one day appear before a judge or the parole board, when everyone knows that he will not be paroled, even if he wants to make an application?
That is the essence of this question about information and protecting witnesses. Are you preparing anything on that? How can we prepare these victims? Unfortunately for some Conservatives, others will go before the parole board, or judges. Has that been looked at? Do you foresee doing that?