My starting point on the sentences for murder is that there's no discretion on the part of judges. The reason there's no discretion is that it's a sentence of murder, and murder means life in prison. The person is serving a sentence for the rest of his or her life.
The issue about this bill, it seems to me, is that it raises a set of questions. I think there are some legitimate questions about the way people serve life sentences in Canada and serve sentences in general, but I think this particular bill takes one part of it and just grafts it on without thinking about, for example, how this is going to play with the abolition of the faint hope clause, so if you're asking--