Just so I'm clear--and I believe this is true of the other members of the committee on both sides of the table--obviously we are all supportive of the amendments that flow out of the Supreme Court of Canada decision. Even if we don't agree with them, we know they have to be in the bill. Clearly there's support from everybody on this committee with regard to not holding youth in adult agencies or custodial positions. Those provisions are there. I'll just make that as a comment.
To pursue this, though, I'd like to go back to the recommendations of the prosecutors. Have you seen those proposed amendments from the testimony they gave here that they followed up with written recommendations?