In any event, you also have the report. I am going to read you a few passages, at page 2:
Little support for changes to the YCJA at this time: Legislation cannot prevent crime, reduce crime or protect the public. Changing legislation will not change behaviour. The YCJA should not be changed just for the sake of change. There was an overwhelming consensus that the perceived flaws are not in the legislation; the flaws are in the system. The development of the YCJA was described as a long and thoughtful process that came from evidence based research. A sensible and defensible Act based on intelligent principles. Any changes should be evidence-based and made following the same thoughtful process.
It was noted that the YCJA is only five years old and it needs “time to take root”. The effectiveness has to be communicated to the public, who, to this point, have not been very well informed. In recognizing that the YCJA is complex legislation that deals with complex issues, the message was clear it should not be amended based on individual cases or stories.
Is that a good summary, in the introduction, of the complaints made to you during your ministerial consultations?