You have it in section 162, very close in the voyeurism offence. The change there is just for grammatical reasons. You have similar language in the child pornography offence in section 163.1.
On February 2nd, 2011. See this statement in context.
On February 2nd, 2011. See this statement in context.
February 2nd, 2011 / 4:55 p.m.
Acting General Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice
You have it in section 162, very close in the voyeurism offence. The change there is just for grammatical reasons. You have similar language in the child pornography offence in section 163.1.
See context to find out what was said next.