Not that I'm aware of. In fact, a Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Sharpe case, the child pornography case in 2001, interpreted all of the components of the child pornography offence, including for sexual purpose and explicit sexual activity, which again the courts would be informed by when they look at this and similar language in the voyeurism offence. So the Supreme Court in the Sharpe case--basically, its interpretation acts objectively viewed that all at the extreme end of the spectrum of sexual activity—
On February 2nd, 2011. See this statement in context.