Certainly we look to the separation between retribution and rehabilitation. I think our agency certainly supports mandatory minimums. We appreciate that there have been some inconsistencies. Again, without the data in front of me, I would point to when the child pornography offences first came out post-Sharpe, and conditional sentences were more often given at that point in time.
Since then, we have moved towards mandatory minimums there, and there has been a change. And it's been a good change. I think it's also done a lot in terms of changing the perception that this really isn't a serious crime, the viewing of images of child sexual abuse.
We certainly support it.