I'm not sure whether I'm following the thread of this, but I thought I understood the witness to raise an issue of cabinet confidentiality earlier, and it sounds as though Mr. Comartin is asking about the same information. If I'm right that he is, then I would think that the same issue of cabinet confidentiality is going to arise on all of his questions about it, and that the witness ought to be protected from having to receive questions that might result in a violation of cabinet confidentiality. For that reason, I'm asking you to rule his questions out of order.
On February 16th, 2011. See this statement in context.