The logic is strange, but it's used all the time. The government runs a lot of gambling, yet spends a lot of money on anti-gambling campaigns, which are not all that effective, I have to admit. The government is very involved in alcohol and spends some money on campaigns against alcohol. I would think, with the money coming in from pot alone, just the stuff that's smoked now.... I don't think there'd be the increase that someone suggested simply because it's made legal. I think you would use that for very effective campaigns against--
On March 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.