Well, as I say, I think the courts already take the guidance of what's in section 161 right now, use the language that's there, and tailor it as appropriate in the circumstances. So they're not constrained by the words on the paper. They may be able to go beyond that in the particular case. I would say that it has included the ability to do that, and that the terminology, “Internet and other digital network”, for the purpose of communicating, is also fairly clear.
On February 28th, 2011. See this statement in context.